|
|
Post by eecc on Aug 6, 2008 23:51:29 GMT -5
You too! =)
|
|
|
|
Post by varcayn on Aug 7, 2008 0:15:14 GMT -5
Toxic blatantly put two and two together and told people that if he dies to look at people defending eecc, which would be me.
So if we could not get him killed and try to reason with him for a while that'd be nice.
My defense for when the time comes:
(Work in progress, in case I need to post it quick)
------
So let's suppose you're right and that I'm a traitor.
If so, I've had access to this site and our entire team's roster since, according to you, the first time I defended eecc (day 4). Maybe even earlier. Since then, no one on our team has been killed by GOD. In fact, everyone on our team has been killed by ISAT, the cops, or the vote.
If I was a a traitor for the cops or for ISAT why are you all still alive? Both groups have shown a desire to kill us. Why would I not just wipe you all out? Leak your names to the thread?
So then lets look at scenario B: I'm a hypothetical GOD agent. Makes sense if you only consider that I defended eecc. However, you'll note that I defended him because I thought he wasn't from ISAT. Guess what? He wasn't. I was right.
But still, you might say "Varcayn is evil!" Note now that GOD hasn't killed a single one of us. The only person they've killed, iamtheaznman, was from ISAT. If GOD was meant to work against us, and I gave them our entire roster, you think we'd all still be here?
Instead, look at our role PM. It's plausible we might have similar aims. I mean hell, we summoned them and now we worship them. Might make sense we both want to kill the techies yeah?
So I bring you to think conclusion: Even if I am a traitor (which I'm not, for the record) I'm a traitor for a faction that we can logically assume is non-malicious. Which is the same thing. We're on the same team. So it doesn't matter if you believe I'm from CIT or from GOD. We're all very likely on the same team for now and if you guys can't see that we're all fucked.
|
|
|
|
Post by varcayn on Aug 7, 2008 0:19:09 GMT -5
Also, we might have to show em this board if it comes to it. I have a bad feeling about this one.
|
|
|
|
Post by varcayn on Aug 7, 2008 0:24:06 GMT -5
You guys should also remember Toxic thinks that Infidel is either part of ISAT or working with them, and thus if we are unwilling to go against him it looks pretty bad to him.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hell Kitty on Aug 7, 2008 1:03:03 GMT -5
You guys should also remember Toxic thinks that Infidel is either part of ISAT or working with them, and thus if we are unwilling to go against him it looks pretty bad to him. The thing is that Infidel is the g0ddamned NETW0RK HEAD. Y0U D0 N0T V0TE F0R THE NETW0RK HEAD AND LIVE. T0xic sh0uld be smarter than that. It's 0bvi0us he's trying t0 play us f0r f00ls. eecc needs t0 threaten him a bit. If we wanted t0, we c0uld wipe them all 0ut in a day, but we didn't. BECAUSE WE SHARE WIN C0NDITI0NS, and taking 0ut CIT isn't 0ur g0al. |
|
|
|
Post by eecc on Aug 7, 2008 1:28:35 GMT -5
Oh my. Toxic is publicly voting for Infidel.
What is he doing?
|
|
|
|
Post by eecc on Aug 7, 2008 1:40:29 GMT -5
Okay. Calmed down. I think. Have written this as a reply to his PM. Will check on it in a few hours when I'm more calm and have had dinner.
===
Why would I vote for Infidel? Lightrider voted for Infidel, and got killed as a result. Why are you voting for Infidel?!
Look, either way, we share victory conditions. We'll not leak who you guys are, because it would be self-defeating for us to have you guys killed. We'll continue to attempt to deflect attention from you guys to other people both as a show of good faith and because it's in our mutual interests.
I'm sorry that this didn't work out.
|
|
|
|
Post by varcayn on Aug 7, 2008 9:15:54 GMT -5
NATIK is being more reasonable.
He wants to know why we haven't killed off the good network if we have infiltrated it and he wants to help us kill it off if eecc can give him a satisfactory answer.
But he wants Toxic to ask you, so you'll have to wait until you get a PM to provide a response.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hell Kitty on Aug 7, 2008 12:02:24 GMT -5
NATIK is being more reasonable. He wants to know why we haven't killed off the good network if we have infiltrated it and he wants to help us kill it off if eecc can give him a satisfactory answer. But he wants Toxic to ask you, so you'll have to wait until you get a PM to provide a response. We have limited kills t0 spare, that's why we need CIT's help. We als0 had an argument because we needed t0 ensure that the c0nversi0n r0b0t gr0up was fully eliminated. |
|
|
|
Post by eecc on Aug 7, 2008 16:11:49 GMT -5
Ahh. This is Toxic's PM to me. (Sorry for the delay - it's 9am here, just got on the computer)
===
Why not kill obbi? If he is part of the village network then he should die correct?
===
Since it only mentions Obbi, I can only deal with Obbi. Otherwise it'd be clear that varcayn is relaying info back to us.
So... something like:
===
Because we believed Wildcat was a robot conversion/ISAT member, and so ranked a higher priority than a guard who was most likely guarding Infidel.
===
How does that sound?
|
|
|
|
Post by Hell Kitty on Aug 7, 2008 16:15:13 GMT -5
Ahh. This is Toxic's PM to me. (Sorry for the delay - it's 9am here, just got on the computer) === Why not kill obbi? If he is part of the village network then he should die correct? === Since it only mentions Obbi, I can only deal with Obbi. Otherwise it'd be clear that varcayn is relaying info back to us. So... something like: === Because we believed Wildcat was a robot conversion/ISAT member, and so ranked a higher priority than a guard who was most likely guarding Infidel. === How does that sound? We als0 needed t0 c00rdinate with them. That's h0w we can help each other. If the village specials turn 0n us, we need t0 precisely place hits t0gether t0 take 0ut the netw0rk in a few sh0ts, s0 they can't rec0ver. |
|
|
|
Post by eecc on Aug 7, 2008 16:17:04 GMT -5
Okay. Will relay that when he follows up with another message, but for now, going to deal directly with his question.
|
|
|
|
Post by eecc on Aug 7, 2008 16:42:01 GMT -5
No reply yet. =P
Voting as far as I can see:
Ego - 4
Toxic Toys - 3
B:L - 2
Obbi - 1
Varcayn - 1
Wildcat - 1
What has Toxic done? =(
|
|
|
|
Post by eecc on Aug 7, 2008 17:06:21 GMT -5
Oh noes! What has Obbi done!?
Egos - 5
B:L, Toxic Toys - 3
Obbi, Varcayn -1
I fear if we don't get the Egos bandwagon running soon, then B:L/Toxic Toys may overtake first place.
|
|
|
|
Post by eecc on Aug 7, 2008 17:14:51 GMT -5
On dear. Zanmatto's voted B:L. It's B:L for second, one vote behind Egos. I'll have to check who's got what vote manips if it's going to be this close.
Edit: Oh noes! B:L, you're... the new bandwagon =(
|
|
